|
HOME | GREEK LANGUAGE |
LIBRARIES |
BLOG | HELP | SEARCH | BOOKSTORE | FREEWARE |
|
|
Translated by Ch. Browne and J. Swallow.
Gregory Theologian Bilingual Anthology, Resources Online and in Print
|
48 Pages
Page 16
28. There arose a disagreement between him and his predecessor [4442] in the rule over this Church: its source and character it is best to pass over in silence, yet it arose. He was a man in other respects far from ignoble, and admirable for his piety, as was proved by the persecution of that time, and the opposition to him, yet his feeling against Basil was one to which men are liable. For Momus seizes not only upon the common herd, but on the best of men, so that it belongs to God alone to be utterly uninfluenced by and proof against such feelings. All the more eminent and wise portion of the Church was roused against him, if those are wiser than the majority who have separated themselves from the world and consecrated their life to God. I mean the Nazarites [4443] of our day, and those who devote themselves to such pursuits. They were annoyed that their chief [4444] should be neglected, insulted, and rejected, and they ventured upon a most dangerous proceeding. They determined to revolt and break off from the body of the Church, which admits of no faction, severing along with themselves no small fraction of the people, both of the lower ranks, and of those of position. This was most easy, owing to three very strong reasons. In the first place, the man was held in repute, beyond any other, I think, of the philosophers of our time, and able, if he wished, to inspire with courage the conspirators. Next, his opponent [4445] was suspected by the city, in consequence of the tumult which accompanied his institution, of having obtained his preferment in an arbitrary manner, not according to the laws and canons. Also there were present some of the bishops [4446] of the West, drawing to themselves all the orthodox members of the Church.
[4442] His predecessor, Eusebius, Archbishop of Caesarea.
[4443] Nazarites, i.e., the monks.
[4444] Their chief, i.e., Basil.
[4445] His opponent, lit. "the man who was vexing him," i.e., Eusebius.
[4446] Bishops. It is uncertain who these bishops were. Clemencet thinks they were Lucifer and Eusebius of Vercellae. But a separation had ere this taken place between them in consequence of Lucifer's rash action at Antioch. Nor is it certain that Eusebius had not already returned to Italy.
Reference address : https://elpenor.org/gregory-nazianzen/funeral-basil.asp?pg=16
